SEC Lawsuits Against Binance and Coinbase Unite the Crypto Industry

Professionals in the crypto sector have responded to the recent actions of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against two of the largest crypto exchanges, Binance and Coinbase.

On June 5, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Binance for allegedly offering unregistered securities. Just a day after Binance filed the suit, the commission also went after Coinbase on similar grounds, alleging that popular cryptocurrencies offered by the exchange, such as Solana (SOL), Polygon (MATIC) and the Sandboxes (SAND), qualify as securities.

Today we have Binance Holdings Ltd. (Binance) charged; US-based affiliate, BAM Trading Services Inc., which operates in conjunction with Binance https://t.co/swcxioZKVP, and their founder, Changpeng Zhao, with a variety of securities law violations. pic.twitter.com/IWTb7Et86H

– US Securities and Exchange Commission (@SECGov) June 5, 2023

Cointelegraph reached out to market players operating in the space for their reaction to the recent actions by the SEC. From sharing the belief that this will drive crypto companies away from the US, to calling the SEC’s actions simply lazy, industry players shared their thoughts on the latest development.

An ‘unacceptable’ approach to regulation

According to Kristin Smith, CEO of the Blockchain Association, although the SEC actions are expected, it is still unacceptable. Smith explained that:

“The SEC does not make laws. Indeed, this approach to regulation is unacceptable, but it is what we have come to expect from the SEC and its anti-crypto stance.

The executive highlighted that while the industry and the US Congress work to develop effective regulation, the SEC “continues to deviate from core policy efforts.” The executive believes that by listing the assets in this way, the SEC is trying to circumvent the formal rulemaking process and deny public engagement.

Meanwhile, Paolo Ardoino, chief technology officer at stablecoin issuer Tether, believes the companies’ complaints against the SEC should be heard. According to Ardoino, the uncertainty of regulations and guidance in the US is becoming a common theme even among the country’s biggest crypto supporters.

Ted Shao, CEO of Turbos Finance, also echoed Smith’s sentiment. Shao says this is “not the direction Web3 developers want to see.” The executive believes that the SEC has shown that it is against the entire Web3 space, as they are also coming after top projects and not just centralized exchanges.

Driving Crypto Players Abroad and Undermining Consumer Confidence

In addition to the SEC’s actions being unacceptable, other professionals working in the sector believe that the effects of this recent move include pushing crypto players into more crypto-friendly jurisdictions and threatening consumer confidence in crypto within the United States. weakening is involved.

Insider Intelligence crypto analyst Will Paige said the recent suit highlights the SEC’s intent to control the space through enforcement in the absence of a regulatory framework. According to Paige, this could potentially undermine the “already weak consumer confidence in cryptocurrencies” in the country.

Ben Casselin, chief strategy officer at crypto exchange MaskX, believes that although this is a case against Binance, it could have implications for other players in the United States. The former AAX executive explained that this “could open up more opportunities for other jurisdictions like Hong Kong, Dubai or even El Salvador to drive innovation and attract capital and talent.”

Oscar Franklin Tan, chief legal officer at immutable token protocol Enjin, agrees with the sentiment. According to Tan, the world will not wait for the US to make up its mind on crypto. Tan explained:

“SEC actions only move talent and innovation from the US to countries with clear regulations that support responsible builders. Singapore said in 2020 that it does not follow the US Howe test. There is a clear self-regulatory framework.”

The executive believes “progressive countries” will reap the benefits, especially now as the explosion in artificial intelligence and extended reality highlights the need for blockchain and true digital ownership.

Connected: US Financial Services Committee sets date for discussion on future of crypto

Doubts on the impartiality and intention of the SEC

While some expressed their confidence in the potential implications of the SEC’s lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase, other crypto professionals searched for the motivation and fairness of the SEC’s move.

The SEC’s mandate is to ensure investor protection, according to David Schwedt, chief operating officer of blockchain securities firm Halborn. Schwed believes this can be done through clear regulations, not enforcement actions. The executive said SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s motivations may be skewed. “It seems to me that their personal ambitions and their need to validate their stance have now superseded their original mandate,” he explained.

Alex Strzeniewski, founder of the decentralized finance protocol AngelBlock, described the SEC’s actions as “lazy”. The executive believes that it does not advance proper regulation. he explained:

“It’s like a school teacher scolding you for giving wrong answers but fails to provide any explanation beyond that. I also don’t believe the SEC is, in fact, on what they are claiming.” They have jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, Tim Shan, chief operating officer of decentralized exchange Dexalot, expressed mixed feelings about the lawsuits, saying the SEC’s actions were unfair to the community.

“They have provided very little clarity or guidance to the crypto community. They are regulating through the courts, which is really quite unfair and not the right way to regulate/govern,” he said.

magazine: Crypto Regulation: Does SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Have the Final Say?