/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23962442/acastro_STK067__03.jpg)
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24247717/lp_logo_3.0.jpg){kind=logo}
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24016885/STK093_Google_04.jpg)
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24808816/Starfield__The_Settled_Systems___Supra_Et_Ultra_____Starfield__The_Settled_Systems___Su)
[ad_1]
A New York attorney has been criticized for using ChatGPT for legal research as part of a lawsuit against a Colombian airline.
Steven Schwartz, an attorney with the New York law firm Levido, Levido & Oberman, was hired by Robert Mata to pursue the injury claim against Avianca Airlines.
Mother claims she was hurt by a serving cart during her flight with the airline in 2019 According In a May 28 report from CNN Business.
However, when a judge noticed inconsistencies and factual errors in the case’s documentation, Schwartz admitted to using ChatGPT for his legal research, According Affidavit on 24 May.
He claims that this was his first time using ChatGPT for legal research and was “unaware of the possibility that its contents may be false.”
in court on 5 april AdmissionThe judge presiding over the case said:
“Six of the cases presented appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus citations and bogus internal citations.”
The judge further claimed that some of the cases referred to in the submission did not exist, and there was an instance where a docket number on one filing was mixed up with another court filing.
Schwartz said he also regrets that he conducted his own due diligence without relying on an artificial chatbot. The affidavit mentioned:
“[Schwartz]deeply regrets using generative artificial intelligence to supplement the legal research conducted here and will never do so in the future without full verification of its authenticity.”
Connected: AI meets blockchain: revolutionizing smart contracts and cryptocurrency
In recent times there has been debate about the extent to which ChatGPT can be integrated into the workforce.
However, reports suggest that ChatGPT’s intelligence levels are on the rise.
But developers are skeptical about whether it has the potential to completely replace humans.
Blockchain developer Syed Ghazanfar said that while he favors ChatGPT, he doubts it has the communication skills to completely replace human workers.
“For it to change you, you have to communicate requirements that are not possible in native English. That’s why we invented programming languages,” he said.
magazine: ‘Moral Responsibility’: Can Blockchain Really Increase Trust in AI?
